February 8, 2018

scienceAlthough united by the core clinical features which make up a diagnosis of autism or autism spectrum disorder (ASD), there is quite widespread acceptance about a significant degree of diversity among the presentation of autism. This heterogeneity, further clouded by the impact of various different comorbidities occurring alongside cases, has done little to progress research to the point of being able to elucidate common genetic or biological pathways which might underpin the presentation of symptoms and offer suitable tools to improve quality of life where and when required.

Moves towards a more plural view of autism – the autisms – as a function of such heterogeneity continue to gather pace, not least because of an emerging body of research suggestive of differing developmental trajectories to be present in subgroups of people on the autism spectrum. The paper by Deborah Anderson and colleagues* further adds to this area with their recent results looking at outcome and autism in the medium- and long-term. Spanning 17 years of research, this most recent report from Anderson looked at various measures of autism-related behaviours and cognitive abilities in young adults with autism aged 19 years. Based on comparisons with similar results for participants taken when aged 2 years old, the authors were able to examine which factors in early infancy may have affected later outcome.

Their results suggested that reports of verbal and non-verbal cognitive abilities measured at aged 2 years were able to quite accurately predict a person’s level of intellectual disability when aged 19. Further the authors reported that a proportion of their participants had, by early adulthood, largely overcome most of their measured core autism symptoms and “lost” their diagnosis. This may also have been linked to an effect from early intervention.

Further work is required to substantiate these findings and provide more detail about those reported as showing optimal outcome. Elucidating further characteristics of potential best responders to early intervention alongside any biological or genetic correlates might also provide important details.

 

* Anderson DK. et al. Predicting young adult outcome among more and less cognitively able individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 9. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12178.

Further commentary on this study can be found at: http://questioning-answers.blogspot.com/2014/02/optimal-outcome-autism-by-any-other-name.html

 

 

About the author 

Paul Whiteley Ph.D.

Researcher based in North East England. An academic background in psychology with a special interest in developmental psychology focused specifically on the autism spectrum and related conditions. Postgraduate degrees based on research examining the safety and efficacy of a gluten- and casein-free (GFCF) diet applied to autism and the potential importance of various comorbidity to the health and wellbeing of those on the autism spectrum, with a continuing research interest in these areas. Keen blogger and amateur science writer (but no formal qualifications in these areas). Science is based on probability.

LinkedIn
Amazon
espa.org.uk/enterprises/espa-research/
scholar.google.com/citations?user=7AKGcI4AAAAJ&hl=en

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

RELATED POSTS

December 24, 2020

From YouTube The United States Senate unanimously passed

November 6, 2020

Liver transplant potentially helpful in rare form of

October 6, 2020

New research conducted by a group of occupational

September 23, 2020

Pain may predict sleeping problems in teens diagnosed

July 15, 2020

A study published in The American Journal of

July 11, 2020

This is part 2 of our review of

June 22, 2020

It may seem like a pipe dream: a

June 4, 2020

CC BY by NIAID The results reported by

May 26, 2020

According to an opinion article written by Laura

>