However several known causes are accepted such as heavy metal exposures, certain medically prescribed drugs etc etc.

Vaccines do not normally affect adults badly or for the most part children but it is babies of one day and older or even in the womb that get vaccines without proof of total safety.

Vaccine inserts point out a variety of possible side effects; the blanket protection for the industry does nothing to help fairplay and stories of companies spending a million dollars to save a payout of several times less dollars are well known. All provide a false idea for the 90 plus per cent that all is well.

It is impossible for an industry that has made and continues to make medicines with side effects that all their vaccines are magically safe.

When researchers are paid highly and either fake results (Thorsen), lie about results (Thompson) or are maligned ahundred times a day for ever (Wakefield) thenwe know propaganda is running the vaccine industry and people especially innocent babies are paying the price of deceit.

Vaccines are and always will be a trade off between high degrees of protection (eg measles) and very low levels of risk (anaphylaxis etc etc etc).

Time to accept the risks and stop defending them, so people can make informed choices.

Pinks Disease, SMON and many other illnesses were foundto be caused by what the medical profession claimed for years was the cause.

It took a hundred to two hundred years to discover repeat vaccines carry much higher risks (Charles Richet on anaphylaxis) and the link of vaccines to autism has only been put forward as an idea recentlyin comparison.

It may be right, it may be wrong but when a child suffers from any vaccine (conjecture) why are doctors often insistent they get more and more of the same things (vaccines) that parents argue were bad for them?

In nearly every story, we are told over and over that an early warning sign was discounted so the child who could have had temporary problems now gets lifelong health issues for whatever reason we choose to believe.

And in all this confusion, yes, there are cases probably where an autism child got better after vaccines possibly? But for me I have never heard of such a case? Do they exist? Plenty (99 per cent) do claim there is no connection.

And why do children get all the vaccines while most adults refuse them?

Lots of questions and no answers as repeat vaccines and higher risks of anaphylaxis are thought to be so necessary that research on avoiding repeat vaccines is considered harmful to the child who does not get all the vaccines which vary from country to country.

Notably the higher the regime of vaccines then there are loose links to the rate of autism.

USA with most vaccines, has for example gone from top to bottom in current child health and not just autism.

France where even the relaxed schedule is avoided to the extent of revamping it back to what it should be has on average much less cases of autism but does have them at a rate several times less than the USA.

See USA poorer health and shorter lives document by the American Academy of Science.